Three shots, three kills: Navy SEALS save ship captain

I’m truly amazed at the US Navy SEALS snipers who shot and killed Somali pirates holding a ship captain captive. Firstly, not being a military enthusiast, I didn’t even know the Navy had snipers. Secondly, I didn’t know that it was even possible to shoot someone in the head 23 metres away from a bobbing boat.

It’s high time that some heavy handed action was taken against these Somali pirates, to send a strong deterrence signal to them. For too long, they have been acting with impunity, seizing supertankers and taking crews hostage. As a trading nation that depends on safe shipping routes, these pirates directly threaten Singapore’s national interests.

—– Continue reading “Three shots, three kills: Navy SEALS save ship captain”

Authorities took 2 days to shut down killer rojak stall?

I am very concerned over what seems to be a lack of efficient procedures in place to avert mass public health tragedies like the recent Geylang Serai rojak stall food poisoning incident.

Three lives have been lost (including one unborn baby), and 146 people have been affected by the food contamination, 48 of whom were hospitalised.

CNA reported that stall patrons started to fall sick between April 2nd (Thu) and 4th (Sat) with food poisoning symptoms such as severe abdominal cramps, vomiting, and diarrhoea. However it was only at 8am on Sat April 4th that officials from the National Environment Agency (NEA) arrived to shut down the stall.

Continue reading “Authorities took 2 days to shut down killer rojak stall?”

Coaxing corporate execs to join politics

The Straits Times did an Insight piece on how difficult it is to get corporate exec types to enter politics. I think they did it from a rather biased angle, assuming that execs will only join the PAP if ever they consider entering politics. But in any case, I think the mindsets expressed pose a challenge for both the ruling party and the opposition in recruiting good men and women to lead the country.

Some of the interviewees said they would be willing to step forward “if one day the Government fails, it is corrupt and there are policy failures”. This is heartening to hear, but is still the wrong thinking. Once the rot is apparent, it may be a bit too late to set things right. Singapore is a small country and cannot afford a “transition period” where things are in a mess. People who have the interest and ability, and genuinely care for their fellow citizens are needed in both the ruling party and the opposition. They should step forward and not wait to be asked, as if it is some badge of honour to be “headhunted”.

Read also: Having a capable alternative party is in the national interest

Graciousness out of whack

I was having lunch at the Kopitiam near my office recently when I noticed hanging all over the ceiling were banners titled “Goodness Gracious Me! Please return your dirty tray”. Apparently this is a joint project by the Straits Times and Kopitiam to promote “graciousness”.

Photobucket

So it seems that clearing your trays in food courts is the new “in” thing for government campaigns. Never did I hear this mentioned as part of the “kindness movement” until PM Lee made it an issue during his National Day Rally speech last year. The PM had quoted an email he received from a lady on making Singapore a better place:

“Actually we should feel quite embarrassed to leave our dirty plates and dirty table for the next diner. In my mum’s house, after eating, we will clear our plates and clean the table…this is a good habit we should adopt outside the home.”

And of course soon after the words left his mouth, government agencies, government-affiliated community organisations and businesses keen to gain favour with the government lined up to promote this new and important campaign.

Don’t get me wrong. I have no problem with promoting kindness and graciousness in Singapore. In fact, I think our lack of civic consciousness is one of the many things that makes us very Third World, despite our First World infrastructure and education.

But I think this emphasis on returning one’s trays shows a complete muddling of priorities. In fact, given the numerous areas in which we lack graciousness, I don’t even consider tray-returning as something we need to give attention to.

Firstly, should we be returning our trays? My answer is: It depends. In school canteens, army camps, company cafeterias, I think we should, because costs need to kept down. But in commercial establishments like Kopitiam and MacDonalds, I don’t think it is necessary. These establishments usually have cleaners who are hired to clear plates. If everyone (or most of us) were to clear our plates ourselves, there would be no reason to keep so many of those cleaners. And even with Jobs Credit, these workers are likely to lose their jobs (since they are mostly contract workers). In fact, at another Kopitiam near my house, the cleaner already looked very free despite most diners ignoring the tray-returning campaign banners.

Photobucket

Having said that, I always make the effort to place all my bones and dirty tissues onto the plates before leaving the table, just to make their lives a bit easier.

So if we don’t focus on tray-returning, what should the Kindness Movement focus on?

Giving up seats on the MRT and buses for a start. This is likely to make a bigger impact on people who need the kindness, like the elderly and pregnant moms.

Photobucket

A few months ago, I came across a bunch of NTU (or is it SMU) students, who had initiated a campaign called Project KLOE (Keep left on escalators) in MRT stations. This is a good, ground up initiative that would help commuters who are rushing to and from work.

Photobucket

Ultimately, I believe most of our bad manners is a result of poor upbringing in a very self-seeking and competitive society. If we want to improve our graciousness, we have to target children and parents. When I see schoolkids happily chatting with each other on MRT seats while an old lady stands in front of them, I wonder if their parents and schools ever told them that they should give up their seat in those situations.



Welcome to my new blog home

Dear readers,

I’ve officially moved from my temporary accomodation at geraldgiam.wordpress.com to my new home at geraldgiam.sg. This is my second move in 4 months, and I apologise for redirecting you again. Rest assured I don’t intend to move again anytime soon — unless of course ISD catches up with me and I’m forced to shut down my blog or send messages from some location in Whitley Rd (just kidding…I hope)!

You’ll probably notice at least two new features of my new blog — my own domain name, and ads. While the new domain name will be shorter to type (for those who don’t believe in using bookmarks), I hope none of you folks are too bothered by the ads. Unfortunately someone has to pay for the hosting (which is no longer free), and I need to save up to buy baby powder. :)

I’d like to take this opportunity to say a big thank you for all of you who regularly visit my blog and leave comments. Your readership and response always motivates me to write more, and put in more effort into each post.

This blog is still a work in progress. I very much welcome feedback on any matter related to this blog — whether it is regarding the topics I write about, my writing style, the blog’s design….anything. I want to improve it to make it a more enjoyable read for you, my readers. You can either leave a comment, or write to me directly at gerald dot giam at gmail dot com.

Let’s keep the conversation going. Hope to hear from you soon!

Best regards,

Gerald

One-eyed Dragon’s kidneys donated to ex-CK Tang chief?

The Straits Times has reported today that the kidneys of Tan Chor Jin (aka One-eyed Dragon) were donated to retail magnate Tang Wee Sung, who received them in an operation yesterday. Tan’s mistress said that Tan had made known he wished to donate his kidneys.

I’m just curious to know whether Tang was in line to receive the kidney, or if he jumped queue because of his power and influence.

Also, are there safeguards to ensure that death row inmates are not used for organ harvesting against their will, like in China, or that their executions are specifically brought forward to suit the needs of recipients? In the case of Tan, he had expressed a wish for his execution to be delayed so that he could hear his son call him ‘Papa’ a few more times.

“One-eyed Dragon” hanged

One-eyed Dragon

Tan Chor Jin (aka “One-eyed Dragon”) hung on Friday morning for murdering a former friend and nightclub owner Lim Hock Soon in 2006. His appeal for clemency to the President was turned down.

Criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan recounted in his memoirs, The Best I Could, his meeting with Mr Tan in August 2008, when he was getting him to sign his petition to the President.

One-eyed Dragon was sceptical about signing the petition, knowing that it would be turned down. But he told his lawyer that he wanted to defer his execution for as long as he could.

This was the exchange, as recounted by Mr Anandan:

One-eyed Dragon thought for a moment. “You know, I want to defer my execution for as long as I can.”

“Why? Are you afraid to die?” I asked.

“No, no, no. I’m not afraid to die. In fact, it would be quite good to die.”

“Then why do you want to delay the execution?”

“When I was arrested and charged, my son was only a few months old. Now he is almost two years old. When he comes to see me, he calls me ‘papa’. I spend time with him even though I’m in this condemned cell. I love that boy and love even more to hear him call me ‘papa’. I just want to hear him call me that for a few months more. That’s why I hope to have the execution delayed.”

I told him that when I send the petition to the President, I could include a note stating his wish. It could give him a little more time. He instructed me to do that.

Mr Tan may have been a convicted murderer who deserved to die under Singapore law, but his crime does not take away an ounce of humanity from him. As a father to a baby daughter, I feel sad for Mr Tan. He will not be able to hear his son call him ‘papa’ any more, and a young boy is going to grow up without a father.

May his soul rest in peace.

Transparency, please, ICA

The Straits Times Forum (6 Dec) carried this letter:

Fewer PRC nationals than reported

THE Special Report, ‘Young dragons’ (Nov 22) gave some gross overestimates of the number of PRC nationals in Singapore.

Our records show that the total number of persons from all Asian countries (excluding South-east Asia) who are in Singapore is 852,000. This includes China, India, Bangladesh and 30 other countries. Hence the number of PRC nationals is obviously only a fraction of that, and not ‘close to one million’ as cited in the report.

Likewise, the number of nationals from these same countries who have acquired permanent residence or Singapore citizenship over the past 20 years is 239,000. Again, only a fraction would have been PRC nationals, and not ‘between 300,000 and 400,000’, as estimated by the Tian Fu Club.

Ong-Kong Yong Sin (Mrs)
Senior Public & Internal Communications Executive
Immigration & Checkpoints Authority

I think it is plain to me that our immigration authorities have the figures but are unwilling to release the exact number of PRC nationals and PRs living in Singapore. This has led to the “gross overestimates” by even supposedly reputable sources like the Straits Times.

Why is it so difficult to release these nuggets of gold? Do Singaporeans not have the right to know how many foreigners from each country are in their midst?

Or is it because the ICA has something to hide — perhaps the fact that this “fraction” of 852,000 is closer to 9/10 than 1/2. I think our government owes it to Singaporeans to come clean with these figures. If it turns out that the vast majority of foreigners and PRs in Singapore originate from China, then they need to explain the reasons for this gross imbalance of immigrants. Are they trying to boost the population of a certain race, or is it just that China produces a disproportionate number of talented people?

Passing of JBJ

Former opposition MP & former Secretary-General of the Workers’ Party, Mr JB Jeyaretnam has died early this morning from heart failure.

I am so sad to hear of the passing of Mr Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam, also known as JBJ. JBJ fought his whole life to bring change to Singapore. All he received from the Government were lawsuits, partisan vitriol and a smearing of his name. Most Singaporeans, especially younger Singaporeans, had no idea what he has contributed to the country. They think he was a crazy man who just opposed for opposition’s sake. That was definitely not the case. If you read his book of parliamentary speeches, you will see countless excellent suggestions that he raised to benefit Singapore, but were simply shot down or dismissed by the ruling party.

Last night I was meeting with a bunch of friends. We were just talking about JBJ. One of my friends remarked that Singapore may not have been kind to JBJ while he was alive, but history will record that JBJ was the man that started the reform of Singapore’s political system.

Our children will thank JBJ for his contributions. I am truly grateful.

Rest in peace in the arms of the Father, Mr JBJ.

.