Countdown to America’s Super Tuesday

The US elections have on occasion been called the most undemocratic in the world. Less than 130 million Americans choose a leader whose decisions will impact 6.5 billion people around the world for four to 8 years. (In the 2004 elections, only 122 million Americans, or 57 per cent of eligible voters, bothered to cast their vote.)

On Tuesday 5 February, Americans in over 20 US states will go to the polls to nominate their party’s candidate for the Presidential election this November. The result of “Super Tuesday” is likely to reveal who the eventual President will be. With support for the Republicans at a low, it is the Democratic Party candidate who stands the best shot at the White House come November.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are running neck to neck in the race, with Obama currently trailing just a few percentage points behind the former First Lady, but fast catching up.

As a Singaporean who spent his college years in the US (in Los Angeles) while the Clintons occupied the White House, I am convinced that Obama is the better choice not just for America, but also the world. I see Obama as an inspirational leader who can unite not just America, but also go a long way to bring the world together.

What the world badly needs right now is a United States that can provide not just military leadership, but also moral leadership based on the strength of its ideals of democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law. These ideals have been badly battered in the last eight years, especially after 9/11, but the world would be worse off without an America that can champion these ideals both in word and deed.

I hope my American friends and readers will begin to fathom the weight of responsibility that rests on your shoulders, and vote on Tuesday for a man who can not only lead America into the future, but also deal with the rest of the world with newfound understanding and respect.

Here’s an editorial from The Los Angeles Times, a major daily in the US, endorsing Barack Obama’s bid for the presidency:

The Los Angeles Times

Editorial

Barack Obama for Democratic nominee

Endorsements for president 2008
February 3, 2008

Democrats preparing to vote in Tuesday’s California primary can mark their ballots with confidence, knowing that either candidate would make a strong nominee and, if elected, a groundbreaking leader and capable president. But just because the ballot features two strong candidates does not mean that it is difficult to choose between them. We urge voters to make the most of this historic moment by choosing the Democrat most focused on steering the nation toward constructive change: We strongly endorse Barack Obama.

The U.S. senator from Illinois distinguishes himself as an inspiring leader who cuts through typical internecine campaign bickering and appeals to Americans long weary of divisive and destructive politics. He electrifies young voters, not because he is young but because he embodies the desire to move to the next chapter of the American story. He brings with him deep knowledge of foreign relations and of this nation’s particular struggles with identity and opportunity. His flair for expression, both in print and on the stump, too easily leads observers to forget that Obama is a man not just of style but of substance. He’s a thoughtful student of the Constitution and an experienced lawmaker in his home state and, for the last three years, in the Senate.

On policy, Obama and his rival Democratic candidate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, are a hairsbreadth apart. Both vow to pull troops from Iraq. Both are committed to healthcare reform. Both offer candid critiques of the failed George W. Bush presidency, its blustering adventurism, its alienating stance toward other countries and its cavalier disregard for sacred American values such as individual liberty and due process of law.

With two candidates so closely aligned on the issues, we look to their abilities and potential as leaders, and their record of action in service of their stated ideals. Clinton is an accomplished public servant whose election would provide familiarity and, most important, competence in the White House, when for seven years it has been lacking. But experience has value only if it is accompanied by courage and leads to judgment.

Nowhere was that judgment more needed than in 2003, when Congress was called upon to accept or reject the disastrous Iraq invasion. Clinton faced a test and failed, joining the stampede as Congress voted to authorize war. At last week’s debate and in previous such sessions, Clinton blamed Bush for abusing the authority she helped to give him, and she has made much of the fact that Obama was not yet in the Senate and didn’t face the same test. But Obama was in public life, saw the danger of the invasion and the consequences of occupation, and he said so. He was right.

Obama demonstrates as well that he is open-eyed about the terrorist threat posed to the nation, and would not shrink from military action where it is warranted. He does not oppose all wars, he has famously stated, but rather “dumb wars.” He also has the edge in economic policy, less because of particular planks in his platform than because of his understanding that some liberal orthodoxies developed during the last 40 years have been overtaken by history. He offers leadership on education, technology policy and environmental protection unfettered by the positions of previous administrations.

By contrast, Clinton’s return to the White House that she occupied for eight years as first lady would resurrect some of the triumph and argument of that era. Yes, Bill Clinton’s presidency was a period of growth and opportunity, and Democrats are justly nostalgic for it. But it also was a time of withering political fire, as the former president’s recent comments on the campaign trail reminded the nation. Hillary Clinton’s election also would drag into a third decade the post-Reagan political duel between two families, the Bushes and the Clintons. Obama is correct: It is time to turn the page.

An Obama presidency would present, as a distinctly American face, a man of African descent, born in the nation’s youngest state, with a childhood spent partly in Asia, among Muslims. No public relations campaign could do more than Obama’s mere presence in the White House to defuse anti-American passion around the world, nor could any political experience surpass Obama’s life story in preparing a president to understand the American character. His candidacy offers Democrats the best hope of leading America into the future, and gives Californians the opportunity to cast their most exciting and consequential ballot in a generation.

In the language of metaphor, Clinton is an essay, solid and reasoned; Obama is a poem, lyric and filled with possibility. Clinton would be a valuable and competent executive, but Obama matches her in substance and adds something that the nation has been missing far too long — a sense of aspiration.

Author: Gerald Giam

Gerald Giam is the Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC. He is a member of the Workers' Party of Singapore. The opinions expressed on this page are his alone.

7 thoughts on “Countdown to America’s Super Tuesday”

  1. Dear Gerald,

    A fine read and article. I think by now you are aware of my preference for Democrat nominee and that is none other than Obama.

    The next question than would be, when it comes to the vote in Nov 08 between McCain (assuming he gets the Republican Ticket) and Obama (assuming he gets the Democrat ticket). Who is the better choice? Not just for USA but for the region and the world?

    Its a tough choice. While I do like Obama vis-a-vis to Clinton, I certainly find it hard to discount McCain’s record of service, ex-war veteran and also (and I am hazarding a guess) his integrity.

    Obama’s biggest weakness is his lack of experience, which in my opinion can be easily mitigated with a strong team which he could assemble.

    Yes, lets hope idealism can triumph this time.

  2. Hi Gerald,
    Only 6 months ago,the mood against Bush and his cowboy cronies was so negative that no one could ever imagine that a Republican stand any chance of being elected into the White House again.
    However, McCain is proving all the pundits wrong and though he is part of the political establishment, his “prisoner of war” mystique might be too good to ignore.
    Let me confess now that long before this presidential campaign, long before he offered himself as a candidate,I was already enamoured to McCain’s life story and what he stood for.
    He had honor and integrity even when he was tortured in Vietnam.
    At one point, his captors wanted to release him ahead of more “longly-held” POW’s ( ostensibly to cultivate favour from his father ( who was Admiral of the ? Fleet), John MaCain refused and insisted that the unwritten rule continued and so he continued in captivity for many more years/ or months.
    I am sure even if Obama became president, I will be happy.
    My gut feeling is the finals will be Clinton vs McCain and the winner is………
    McCain!

    Dr.Huang

  3. oh…in case anyone had missed the article, LKY had mentioned implcitly that he could not figure the hoo ha over Obama. To him, between McCain and Obama, one who have plenty of administrative experience vs a one-term senator…who is the better choice?

    In any case, I do agree with nofearsingapore. I do admire McCain’s POW record. I had not done a study or am familiar with McCain’s position, political leanings, background or his own personal life….but suffice to say, I bet there are much less skeleton in a closet than Clinton.

    Heck, I think most candidates have less skeleton in the closet than Clinton…

  4. Actually McCain was my choice before I started watching more of Obama. Even if McCain were to win in Nov, I’d still be happy. But please not Hillary. Put Bill back if you must, but no Hillary please.

    About LKY’s comments, what more can you expect from someone who disdains youthful idealism? Or maybe he’s pre-empting the possiblity of someone charismatic and inspirational like Obama rising up in Singapore to call for ‘Change’.

  5. Hi Gerald & “old friend”,
    I must start eating my shoe as punishment for saying that Obama will not win the Democratic nomination. He just might.

    But winning the support from the conservative “Republican-types” in the Bible-belt will be an uphill task. So unless he gets the first-time voters excited to turn up in large numbers in Nov 08, we may still have another white male president.

    Yes Obama mentioned Singapore as example of successful educational system esply in Maths and Science.

    Cheers

    Dr.Huang

  6. “An old friend” – Thanks for the YouTube link! I’m gonna put it on my blog. He’ll probably be the first US president who knew about Singapore before taking office. :)

    In fact one thing that made me realise this guy could be good for the world, is that he knows how to pronounce “Pakistan” right. (Pah-kis-tahn, not Pack-is-stan like most yanks, incl Bush say)

    Dr Huang – You mentioned about the Bible belt Christians. Well I know a lot of Christians in the US whom I thought would never vote against the Republicans, and I’m surprised some of them are endorsing Obama over McCain.

Comments are closed.