Photos from my 30 January book launch of Singapore version 2.0 by Gerald Giam and 迈向政治发展与繁荣 (Towards political development and progress) by Yaw Shin Leong.
Category: Singapore
Egypt’s Mubarak resigns
TWO weeks ago, when I first read the news of the protests in Egypt, I cynically remarked to my wife that the protests will carry on for a few days then fizzle out. How wrong I was–and how glad I am that I was wrong! Every nation has its generation of heroes, who often comprise of the younger generation–more energetic, more idealistic and less cynical of the possibility of change. I believe Singapore’s time for change will come soon.
TWO weeks ago, when I first read the news of the protests in Egypt, which followed the popular uprising and toppling of the government in Tunisia, I cynically remarked to my wife that the protests will carry on for a few days then fizzle out. Life in Egypt will then return to “normal” under the authoritarian rule of President Hosni Mubarak, who has been in power for the past 30 years.
How wrong I was–and how glad I am that I was wrong! Just over an hour ago, Mubarak’s resignation was announced on state television by his recently-appointed vice-president, Omar Suleiman. Following that brief 30-second message, scenes of jubilation erupted on Tahrir (Liberation) Square in central Cairo. Al Jazeera reported of protesters dropping to their knees in prayer and then rising and chanting “God is great”. A 30-year old Egyptian Al Jazeera reporter dropped all pretences of impartiality and shared that all her life she had known no other leader but Mubarak, and described her feelings of elation at his departure. Even the state television station newscaster reportedly cracked a smile after reading out her report. CNN reported that demonstrations initiated over the Internet, on Facebook and Twitter, had resulted in the downfall of the Middle East’s strongest dictators.
Video of speech at book launch of “Singapore version 2.0”
This is the video of my speech at the official launch of my book, Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore.
This is the video of my speech at the official launch of my book, Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore.
The text of the speech can be found here.
My book launch speech
I officially launched my book, Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore, on Sunday 30 January at the Oxford Hotel. This was a joint book launch with my Workers’ Party colleague Yaw Shin Leong, who has written a Chinese book, 迈向政治发展与繁荣’ (Towards Political Development and Vibrancy).
A big thank you to all our friends, readers and media representatives who attended the event on a rainy Sunday afternoon!
This is the speech which I delivered at the launch.
Official launch of my book, Singapore version 2.0
I will be officially launching my book, Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore, together with my Workers’ Party friend and colleague, Yaw Shin Leong. The book launch will take place on Sunday 30 January 2011 from 3-5pm at the Oxford Hotel. As seating is limited, please email me at gerald.giam{at}gmail.com to reserve your place.
Dear Readers,
I will be officially launching my book, Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore, together with my Workers’ Party friend and colleague, Yaw Shin Leong, who has written a Chinese book, 迈向政治发展与繁荣. The book launch will take place on Sunday 30 January 2011 from 3-5pm at the Oxford Hotel. Attendance is free but seating is limited. Please email me at gerald.giam{at}gmail.com to reserve your place. Note that only registered guests will be admitted. I hope to meet some of you there!
The publicity poster and programme is below.
————————–
Political activists Yaw Shin Leong (饶欣龙) and Gerald Giam (严燕松) will be jointly launching their books, 迈向政治发展与繁荣 (Towards political development and progress) and Singapore version 2.0: Alternative proposals for a better Singapore respectively.
Shin Leong and Gerald both sit on the Central Executive Council (CEC) of the Workers’ Party of Singapore. This event is organised in their personal capacities.
You are cordially invited to attend this book launch:
Date: Sunday, 30 January 2010
Time: 3.00 – 5.00 pm (admission of registered guests starts at 2.30 pm)
Venue: Oxford Hotel, 218 Queen Street, Singapore 188549
Programme:
| 2.30pm | Registration of guests |
| 3.00 pm | Welcome and introduction |
| 3.15 pm | Book highlights |
| 3.35 pm | Personal sharing by authors about their motivations for writing the books and entering politics |
| 3.45 pm | Q & A |
| 4.15 pm | Book signing |
| 4.15 pm | Snacks and refreshments |
| 5.00 pm | End of programme |
—
The birth rate blame game
The TFR was 1.61 in 1983. Seventeen years later, in 2000, TFR still held steady at 1.6. But in just 10 years between 2000 and 2010, the fertility rate have seen a dramatic drop from 1.6 in 2000, to 1.26 in 2004, and to 1.16 last year. Coincidentally, this is also the period in which we have seen the most dramatic increase in our population through immigration and the import of foreign workers. Our population grew more than 25 per cent from four million to five million in this period. Could there be a link between the increase in population and the drop in birth rates?
Just like a broken record player, that tired refrain is heard yet again: We must welcome more new immigrants otherwise our economy will tank.
In recent days, with the release of the Census findings that Singapore’s total fertility rate (TFR) has dropped to an all time low of 1.16, this rhetoric has turned to blame-shifting: It is your fault, Singaporeans, for not producing more offspring. You have left us with no choice but to open the floodgates to foreigners.
Workers’ Party Open House, 17 January
The Workers’ Party will be holding its weekly Open House tomorrow, Monday 17 January 2011. I will be one of the party members on duty. Do come down for a chat if you’re free.
Date: Monday 17 January 2011
Time: 8 – 9.30 pm
Venue: Workers’ Party HQ, 216-G Syed Alwi Road #02-03
Look forward to seeing you there!
Check your name on the Register of Electors
The General Election and Presidential Election are around the corner. The Elections Department has just revised the Register of Electors (i.e., the voter roll) and it is now open for inspection. You can check online at the Elections Department website using your SingPass or NRIC.
If you failed to vote in the last election when your constituency was contested, your name may have been struck off the roll. To restore your name, click here to fill out the form and send it in to the Elections Department.
Note: You cannot vote or stand for election if your name is not on the register.
Jobless at 62, no CPF until 65 or later
The real reason for all these changes is plain to all thinking Singaporeans: The PAP government does not want to have the burden of looking after our old folks if they run out of retirement savings. This, in my opinion, is typical of the PAP’s calculating and heartless style of government.
The writing has been on the wall since 2007, when the government announced plans to introduce re-employment legislation, in tandem with raising the age at which Singaporeans can withdraw the bulk of their CPF savings to 65.
On Tuesday (11 January 2011), the Retirement Age (Amendment) Bill was passed. This Bill (now euphemistically named the Retirement and Re-employment Act) contains some provisions to steer employers in the direction of providing re-employment for their retiring workers, without actually raising the statutory retirement age.
While the law requires employers to offer re-employment to their workers when they reach the retirement age of 62, they are obliged to do so only if the workers fulfil a potentially subjective set of criteria: One, the employee must have at least satisfactory work performance, and two, the employee is medically fit to continue working.
The first criteria is very subjective, particularly if the employer has no proper performance appraisal system. The second criteria does not spell out that employers need to obtain the opinion of a doctor to prove that the employee is medically unfit to continue working.
But what is particularly disturbing is that this legislation gives the government the excuse to raise the CPF Minimum Sum Draw Down age from 62 to 65 or even older. They will reason that older workers can more easily find employment beyond 62 and so they don’t need to draw from their CPF savings. (The Minimum Sum, which now stands at $123,000, is the minimum amount of money that a person must keep in their CPF accounts. This large amount means that a large number of low-income workers have their retirement savings locked up long beyond their retirement age.) The reason, as explained the Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in 2007, is so that their CPF savings can last longer.
Youths and politics
It may come as a surprise to some, but I disagree with former Nominated MP Siew Kum Hong’s view that “school and grassroots work don’t mix” (Today newspaper, 4 January 2011). I disagree with the thinking that if you are still in school, then you should not have anything to do with politics; that politics is somehow an “adults-only” activity which will corrupt young minds.
It may come as a surprise to some, but I disagree with former Nominated MP Siew Kum Hong’s view that “school and grassroots work don’t mix” (Today newspaper, 4 January 2011). Mr Siew felt that “partisan activities that favour a specific political party or politician should not be officially sanctioned and endorsed by the Ministry of Education (MOE) or schools” and that “campaigning for political parties and politicians is clearly improper in schools and workplaces”.
I disagree with the thinking that if you are still in school, then you should avoid partisan politics; that politics is somehow an “adults-only” activity which will corrupt young minds. Consequently, this leads to local schools and even universities banning any partisan political organisations. For example, in the National University of Singapore, students who are interested in politics can only join a club like the Democratic Socialist Club, which disavows any political affiliation. In contrast, when I was studying in the University of Southern California, there was a College Republicans club and and College Democrats club. Members openly supported and campaigned for Republican or Democratic candidates during the local, state or national elections. A search on the Internet will find numerous Republican or Democrat clubs in high schools across the US.