My response to RAdm Lui’s remarks about “self-regulation”

TODAY newspaper asked me for my views on Senior Minister of State for Information Lui Tuck Yew’s remarks about how the local online community has not “self-regulated” regarding the Seng Han Thong affair. Here are my responses, all of which did not get published.

1) What do you think of Mr Lui’s comments, especially his comments on how the online community should be more self-regulating?

I agree in principle, but self-regulation is not something that the Govt or individual bloggers can impose. It boils down to how individual Netizens wish to portray themselves to their readers.

2) How fair do you think Mr Lui’s comments are?

I think he made some sweeping generalisations. I personally responded to some unkind comments on one blog. The Online Citizen also ran an article criticizing some Netizens for their unkind remarks. This was not highlighted by Mr Lui.

It should be noted that many of the unkind comments were directed at the Govt, not Mr Seng personally. The criticism should therefore be seen in that context.

I think it’s appropriate to ask: What about those who are pro-govt or were indignant about the unkind criticism they read online? Why didn’t they step forward to comment or blog about it? They are also part of blogosphere and have a part to play in shaping the Net culture in Singapore.

3) What do you think we can do to improve the quality of online public discussion?

I think those bloggers with a higher readership can help shape the tone of discussion. It’s not to say that they should impose anything on fellow Netizens, but they could lead by example.

As more citizens from both sides of the political spectrum join blogosphere, I believe we will naturally see more balance.

Author: Gerald Giam

Gerald Giam is the Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC. He is a member of the Workers' Party of Singapore. The opinions expressed on this page are his alone.

7 thoughts on “My response to RAdm Lui’s remarks about “self-regulation””

  1. The reporter was ‘fishing’ and baiting you, lah.

    Hoping to quote you siding with Lui. The press apparently tried that trick on many a prominent bloggers (see Yawning Bread, for example). The reporter were naturally disappointed one who seek falsehood, would surely be disappointed.

  2. Hi you forgot to mention when Someone’s Daughter made the remark of the Low Class can’t remember what thing and maybe People criticize her for it.

    I think the gal’s name is Wee Shu Min. =D

    Is this counted as Active Netizen Regulation?

  3. Mr Giam, the third question is a bait and you took it. The question is a loaded one with a false assumption. That assumption should have been challenged.

  4. Whether or not the reporter was baiting me, I don’t know. But my answers were what I honestly felt. Please feel free to challenge my assumptions too.

  5. Perhaps the next time the reporters ask you for comments, you can turn them down, and say, “Why comment when it’s not going to be published?”

  6. James – don’t get me wrong. I’m not upset that my comments weren’t published. Even if they don’t publish it, I can always post it here on my blog and get a response from you guys.

    In fact, the fact that my comments weren’t published sort of debunks the theory that the reporter was trying to bait me into agreeing with Lui. I *did* agree in principle with Lui, but yet my comments weren’t published. Alex Au on the other hand had his comments published, despite the contrarian view he took.

Comments are closed.