Grassroots advisers are not accountable either
This was a letter I sent to the Straits Times on 28 October, which the paper declined to publish.
———-
I refer to the letter, “Advisers and MPs have different roles” (Straits Times, Oct 27), by Mr Lim Yuin Chien, press secretary to the Minister for National Development.
Mr Lim stated that “Opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers, because they do not answer to the ruling party”.
The adviser to grassroots organisations is appointed by the People’s Association (PA), a statutory board under the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports. The adviser therefore does not answer to the ruling party but to PA. It appears Mr Lim has confused a political party with a non-partisan statutory board.
Furthermore, nowhere in the People’s Association Act nor the PA’s rules and regulations does it state that “opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers”. I am therefore confused as to how Mr Lim arrived at this conclusion.
Mr Lim further wrote that opposition MPs have no constitutional or legal obligation to carry out national programmes on the Government’s behalf. I would point out that neither do the grassroots advisers, since they are just volunteers, and not paid officers of the Government.
On the other hand, elected MPs are accountable to their constituents. If they mismanage the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP), they risk being voted out of office at the next elections, losing all the benefits that come with the job.
It would therefore be reasonable to conclude that the MPs have a far greater incentive than the advisers to manage the LUP well, for the benefit of residents. Furthermore, given their chairmanship of the town council, MPs would be more familiar with the estates under their charge, and in a better position to advise the Housing and Development Board (HDB) on how the LUP can best meet the needs of their residents.
It is unfortunate that the HDB has overlooked this reality and has chosen to work primarily with the advisers instead of the elected MPs to implement the LUP in opposition wards.
Gerald Giam
| Please support my campaign. Buy my book. Click here. |
Email

I am a member of the Workers' Party. I blog in my personal capacity about policy issues in Singapore. 


November 4th, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Our Straits Times indeed deserves the ranking it gets.
November 5th, 2009 at 11:34 AM
[...] Election – TOC: Two Paradoxes of Singaporean Political Economy – Gerald Giam’s Blog: Grassroots advisers are not accountable either – Jacob 69er: SDP does not exist – The Temasek Review: SPP rebukes PM Lee’s insinuation that [...]
November 6th, 2009 at 2:46 PM
Nice one Gerald
Surprised that they don’t realise that they are not just taking on the 2 opposition MPs but 33% of the voters (plus probably some of the 66%)…hahah
November 7th, 2009 at 11:23 AM
[...] in Singapore – TOC: Two Paradoxes of Singaporean Political Economy – Gerald Giam’s Blog: Grassroots advisers are not accountable either – Jacob 69er: SDP does not exist – The Temasek Review: SPP rebukes PM Lee’s insinuation that [...]