<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My response to RAdm Lui&#8217;s remarks about &#8220;self-regulation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/</link>
	<description>Alternative proposals for a better Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:59:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Giam</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Giam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>James - don&#039;t get me wrong. I&#039;m not upset that my comments weren&#039;t published. Even if they don&#039;t publish it, I can always post it here on my blog and get a response from you guys.

In fact, the fact that my comments weren&#039;t published sort of debunks the theory that the reporter was trying to bait me into agreeing with Lui. I *did* agree in principle with Lui, but yet my comments weren&#039;t published. Alex Au on the other hand had his comments published, despite the contrarian view he took.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; don&#8217;t get me wrong. I&#8217;m not upset that my comments weren&#8217;t published. Even if they don&#8217;t publish it, I can always post it here on my blog and get a response from you guys.</p>
<p>In fact, the fact that my comments weren&#8217;t published sort of debunks the theory that the reporter was trying to bait me into agreeing with Lui. I *did* agree in principle with Lui, but yet my comments weren&#8217;t published. Alex Au on the other hand had his comments published, despite the contrarian view he took.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the next time the reporters ask you for comments, you can turn them down, and say, &quot;Why comment when it&#039;s not going to be published?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the next time the reporters ask you for comments, you can turn them down, and say, &#8220;Why comment when it&#8217;s not going to be published?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 9 Feb 2009</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 9 Feb 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>[...] attack on Seng Han Thong is SPH! - a writer&#8217;s blog: Engaging creatively online - Gerald Giam: My response to RAdm Lui’s remarks about “self-regulation” - SilentAssassin&#8217;s Archive: Internet Regulation: more to come? - My Little Corner: Online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attack on Seng Han Thong is SPH! &#8211; a writer&#8217;s blog: Engaging creatively online &#8211; Gerald Giam: My response to RAdm Lui’s remarks about “self-regulation” &#8211; SilentAssassin&#8217;s Archive: Internet Regulation: more to come? &#8211; My Little Corner: Online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Giam</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Giam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Whether or not the reporter was baiting me, I don&#039;t know. But my answers were what I honestly felt. Please feel free to challenge my assumptions too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the reporter was baiting me, I don&#8217;t know. But my answers were what I honestly felt. Please feel free to challenge my assumptions too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local talent</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>local talent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Mr Giam, the third question is a bait and you took it. The question is a loaded one with a false assumption. That assumption should have been challenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Giam, the third question is a bait and you took it. The question is a loaded one with a false assumption. That assumption should have been challenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ling</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Hi you forgot to mention when Someone&#039;s Daughter made the remark of the Low Class can&#039;t remember what thing and maybe People criticize her for it.

I think the gal&#039;s name is Wee Shu Min. =D

Is this counted as Active Netizen Regulation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi you forgot to mention when Someone&#8217;s Daughter made the remark of the Low Class can&#8217;t remember what thing and maybe People criticize her for it.</p>
<p>I think the gal&#8217;s name is Wee Shu Min. =D</p>
<p>Is this counted as Active Netizen Regulation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George say:</title>
		<link>http://geraldgiam.sg/2009/02/my-response-to-radm-luis-remarks-about-self-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>George say:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geraldgiam.wordpress.com/?p=412#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>The reporter was &#039;fishing&#039; and baiting you, lah.

Hoping to quote you siding with Lui. The press apparently tried that trick on many a prominent bloggers (see Yawning Bread, for example). The reporter were naturally disappointed one who seek falsehood, would surely be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reporter was &#8216;fishing&#8217; and baiting you, lah.</p>
<p>Hoping to quote you siding with Lui. The press apparently tried that trick on many a prominent bloggers (see Yawning Bread, for example). The reporter were naturally disappointed one who seek falsehood, would surely be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

